Of course the answer should be true.
1. Due to religious exemptions, same-sex “marriage” would not harm the rights of parents, schools, churches, or religious ministries.
False. In Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was legalized, public school children as young as first grade are taught that homosexuality is morally good, and parents are prohibited by court order from opting out their children or even being informed of when the “instruction” will occur. Further, when Catholic Charities of Boston’s adoption services refused to place children with homosexual couples, the large and respected ministry was forced to shut down. Family Research Council experts are making Congress and the public aware of such dangers, as homosexual activists work to impose same-sex “marriage” on the entire nation.Sexuality of any nature is a fact. For those who are heterosexual, heterosexuality is morally good. For those who are homosexual, homosexuality is morally good. To act differently than we are created by God would be morally offensive.
Catholic Charities of Boston was not forced to shut down. Catholic News Service wrote at the time, Catholic Charities of the Boston Archdiocese announced March 10 that it will stop providing adoption services rather than continue to comply with a state law requiring no discrimination against gay and lesbian couples who seek to adopt.
It was their own choice ... they were not forced.
Again, the answer should be true.
2. Science indicates that homosexuality is likely inborn and unchangeable.
False. The U.S. Justice Department recently claimed that homosexuality is unchangeable and thus refused to defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court. Yet the best science actually refutes this assertion. The handful of small studies that purport to show a “gay gene” have been widely discounted by the majority of the scientific community. On the other hand, decades of sociological and psychological research indicate that same-sex attraction is not inborn but is likely a product of external factors. And leading psychologists have affirmed the existence of thousands of people who changed from homosexual attractions to heterosexual. FRC is exploding the myths and making sure that lawmakers, judges, and the public know the facts.So, why did the Justice Department make this claim? Because major health organizations say so. The immutable nature of sexuality is part of the statements of the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, the American Counseling Association, and others.
The same documents indicate that the full nature of sexuality is not known. Claiming that "same-sex attraction is not inborn but is likely a product of external factors" cannot be shown at this point in the research into the nature of sexuality.
The claim that people change from homosexual to heterosexual attraction is fiction. I discussed the liars behind "reparative therapy" in a recent posting.
This is an area where a definitive true or false cannot be stated.
3. Homosexual activists have grossly overstated the number of homosexuals in the population as being 10%, when surveys actually show it is only half that number, at about 5%!
False. It’s even lower! The vast majority of recent surveys put the figure at about 2%–3%. In other words, the Left is demanding that parents be forced to allow their children to learn that homosexuality is healthy and moral . . . that the 5,000-year-old-plus definition of marriage be abolished . . . that religious adoption agencies violate their beliefs or close down . . . to accommodate the behavior of 2%–3% of the population. FRC experts are forcefully making the case to Congress that this demand is unreasonable and unjust.The origin of population estimates of homosexuals goes back to the studies of Dr. Alfred Kinsey who, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, determined that approximately ten percent of the population is homosexual. (Really it was more complicated, but that is the simplified answer). There are many recent studies that find between two percent and thirteen percent of the population identifies as homosexual or bisexual. There are numerous reasons why there may be such disparity in the numbers. Among these reasons are how the question is posed, who is posing the question, and what assurance there is that the answer will not be used against those responding to the question. Many gays and lesbians are in the closet. We cannot at this time know a certain number.
Perhaps more important is that the Family Research Council thinks that a smaller minority is more deserving of discrimination. That flies in the face of fairness and decency.
This is absurd on its face. False.
4. Members of Congress from both parties support a pro-homosexual law that could force Christians to remove family photos from their workplace.
True. The proposed Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)—co-sponsored in the Senate by two Republicans and two Democrats—would force most employers to ensure a workplace free of “discrimination” against homosexuals, bisexuals, and transgender people. When such a policy was imposed at Sandia National Laboratories, many employees were ordered to take down Bible verses from screensavers and remove photos of their “traditional” families because homosexual employees found the images to be demeaning. FRC is in the trenches in Washington exposing the proposed law.Absurd. The 2009 ENDA is online. It includes nothing about limiting family photos. If the Bible verses on screensavers on work computers are discriminatory, then that might be limited. In my search online for the basis of the allegation that Sandia National Laboratories forced employees to remove family photos, every source cited Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council. There may be more evidence, but I did not find it.
If the people are the most qualified, then they should not be discriminated against and kept from holding jobs. This is probably the only quiz question when I have any agreement with the answer.
5. The proposed federal ENDA law would force all employers to hire transsexuals, cross-dressers, and “drag queens” and “drag kings” for any job—including customer service jobs and ones with children, such as teachers and day care workers.
You are correct!True. This radical bill (H.R. 1397 and S. 811) not only mandates acceptance of all “sexual orientations,” but also of all “gender identities.” “Gender identity” is defined in the bill as “the gender-related identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, with or without regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth.” In other words—the individual does not have to undergo “sex change” surgery. He or she does not even have to present the same “gender identity” consistently—it could change from day to day. And for employers covered by the bill, NO occupations or job positions are exempted. FRC experts are making sure that members of Congress are aware of this threat.
Thanks to Joe My God for the heads up.