The Family Research Council has put together a "
Quiz on Defending Family Values", complete with answers that do not agree with facts. Sorry if you wanted to play their game, but I going to refute each of the supposed answers here and now. Each of the five questions are supposed to be answered with a
True or
False.
1. Due to religious exemptions, same-sex “marriage” would
not harm the rights of parents, schools, churches, or religious
ministries.
Of course the answer should be true.
False. In Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was legalized, public school children as young as first grade are taught that homosexuality is morally good, and parents are prohibited by court order
from opting out their children or even being informed of when the
“instruction” will occur. Further, when Catholic Charities of Boston’s
adoption services refused to place children with homosexual couples, the
large and respected ministry was forced to shut down.
Family Research Council experts are making Congress and the public aware
of such dangers, as homosexual activists work to impose same-sex
“marriage” on the entire nation.
Sexuality of any nature is a fact. For those who are heterosexual, heterosexuality is morally good. For those who are homosexual, homosexuality is morally good. To act differently than we are created by God would be morally offensive.
Catholic Charities of Boston was not forced to shut down. Catholic News Service wrote at the time,
Catholic Charities of the Boston Archdiocese announced March 10 that it will stop providing adoption services rather than continue to comply with a state law requiring no discrimination against gay and lesbian couples who seek to adopt.
It was their own choice ... they were not forced.
2. Science indicates that homosexuality is likely inborn and unchangeable.
Again, the answer should be true.
False. The U.S. Justice Department recently claimed
that homosexuality is unchangeable and thus refused to defend the
federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court. Yet the best science actually refutes this assertion. The handful of small studies that purport to show a “gay gene” have been widely discounted by the majority of the scientific community. On the other hand, decades
of sociological and psychological research indicate that same-sex
attraction is not inborn but is likely a product of external factors. And leading psychologists have affirmed the existence of thousands of people who changed from homosexual attractions to heterosexual. FRC is exploding the myths and making sure that lawmakers, judges, and the public know the facts.
So, why did the Justice Department make this claim? Because major health organizations say so. The immutable nature of sexuality is part of the statements of the
American Medical Association, the
American Psychiatric Association, the
American Academy of Pediatrics, the
American Psychological Association, the
American Counseling Association, and others.
The same documents indicate that the full nature of sexuality is not known. Claiming that "same-sex attraction is not inborn but is likely a product of external factors" cannot be shown at this point in the research into the nature of sexuality.
The claim that people change from homosexual to heterosexual attraction is fiction. I discussed
the liars behind "reparative therapy" in a recent posting.
3. Homosexual activists have grossly overstated the number
of homosexuals in the population as being 10%, when surveys actually
show it is only half that number, at about 5%!
This is an area where a definitive true or false cannot be stated.
False. It’s even lower! The vast majority of recent
surveys put the figure at about 2%–3%. In other words, the Left is
demanding that parents be forced to allow their children to learn that
homosexuality is healthy and moral . . . that the 5,000-year-old-plus
definition of marriage be abolished . . . that religious adoption
agencies violate their beliefs or close down . . . to accommodate the
behavior of 2%–3% of the population. FRC experts are forcefully making
the case to Congress that this demand is unreasonable and unjust.
The origin of population estimates of homosexuals goes back to
the studies of Dr. Alfred Kinsey who, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, determined that approximately ten percent of the population is homosexual. (Really it was more complicated, but that is the simplified answer). There are many recent studies that find between
two percent and thirteen percent of the population identifies as homosexual or bisexual. There are numerous reasons why there may be such disparity in the numbers. Among these reasons are how the question is posed, who is posing the question, and what assurance there is that the answer will not be used against those responding to the question. Many gays and lesbians are in the closet. We cannot at this time know a certain number.
Perhaps more important is that the Family Research Council thinks that a smaller minority is more deserving of discrimination. That flies in the face of fairness and decency.
4. Members of Congress from both parties support a
pro-homosexual law that could force Christians to remove family photos
from their workplace.
This is absurd on its face. False.
True. The proposed Employment Non-Discrimination Act
(ENDA)—co-sponsored in the Senate by two Republicans and two
Democrats—would force most employers to ensure a workplace free of
“discrimination” against homosexuals, bisexuals, and transgender people.
When such a policy was imposed at Sandia National Laboratories, many employees were ordered to take down Bible verses from screensavers and remove photos of their “traditional” families because homosexual employees found the images to be demeaning. FRC is in the trenches in Washington exposing the proposed law.
Absurd. The
2009 ENDA is online. It includes nothing about limiting family photos. If the Bible verses on screensavers on work computers are discriminatory, then that might be limited. In my search online for the basis of the allegation that Sandia National Laboratories forced employees to remove family photos, every source cited Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council. There may be more evidence, but I did not find it.
5. The proposed federal ENDA law would force all employers
to hire transsexuals, cross-dressers, and “drag queens” and “drag
kings” for any job—including customer service jobs and ones with
children, such as teachers and day care workers.
If the people are the most qualified, then they should not be discriminated against and kept from holding jobs. This is probably the only quiz question when I have any agreement with the answer.
You are correct!True. This radical bill (H.R. 1397 and S. 811) not
only mandates acceptance of all “sexual orientations,” but also of all
“gender identities.” “Gender identity” is defined in the bill as “the
gender-related identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other
gender-related characteristics of an individual, with or without regard
to the individual’s designated sex at birth.” In other words—the
individual does not have to undergo “sex change” surgery. He or she does
not even have to present the same “gender identity” consistently—it
could change from day to day. And for employers covered by the bill, NO
occupations or job positions are exempted. FRC experts are making sure
that members of Congress are aware of this threat.
The threat of treating all American citizens equally. The language that FRC uses is designed to evoke fear. The truth is that a person's sexual orientation and gender identity do not cause them to be better or worse employees. The truth is that FRC's campaign of fear to maintain discriminatory laws is based on lies.
Thanks to
Joe My God for the heads up.
