On 6 January 2012, Dr. Ryan's article in
Psychology Today is a clear refutation of many of the points that Mr. Santorum continually makes on the campaign trail. The brief opening line is an apt summary.
Rick Santorum doesn’t know what sex is for.
Here are a few teasers about why you should click on the first link above and read the full article. First is part of the response to Mr. Santorum's argument that contraception is morally wrong.
For Homo sapiens, sex is primarily about establishing and
maintaining relationships—relationships often characterized by love, or
at least affection. Reproduction is a by-product of human sexual
behavior, not its primary purpose.
Mr. Santorum argues for monogamy.
Of the hundreds of species of primates, there are precisely no
monogamous species living in multi-male groups—except humans, if you buy
scientific or religious arguments for the naturalness of human
monogamy.
But isn't it really all about having children, without which there is not future for society?
Santorum is inadvertently correct that sex “keeps civilization going.”
But he’s wrong to credit only heterosexual reproductive sex. Sex of all
kinds comes naturally to our species, and most of it has little to do
with reproduction, and a great deal to do with loving one another. Sex
and love hold communities—not just families—together.
Dr. Ryan is offering the orthodox opinion of the medical and the scientific community. It is time for the outdated notions of Mr. Santorum and his ilk to be relegated to history books along with other forms of senseless bigotry. Go on ... read the
full article.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No longer open for freely commenting.